HOW LEADING 100 EQ-i DEBRIEFS MADE ME A BETTER COACH

I didn't think leading EQ-i 2.0 debriefs would make me a better coach.

I didn't think it would make me a worse coach, either.

To be honest, I didn't think the two had much to do with each other.

I assumed the structure and data baked into a debrief would make it more informative, and any transformative coaching would happen in later sessions.

After leading more than 100 of these over the past 8 months, I am pleased to say I was wrong.

This journey has strengthened my coaching in three ways:

✅My curiosity has deepened.

✅I challenge my clients with more ease.

✅ We get to the heart of the matter faster.

Using EQ-i data hasn’t limited my curiosity; if anything, it’s expanded it. Rather than providing answers, the data gives me valid, reliable clues about how my client shows up at their best and their not-so-best. When I offer these as invitations into deeper self-discovery, clients often feel seen and safe enough to share how this plays out in their work and their lives. What often takes multiple sessions to uncover can emerge in a single 60-minute debrief, even with clients who don’t open up easily.

What I’ve come to appreciate is that a great debrief and a great coaching conversation aren’t separate experiences; they’re complementary. The structure creates clarity, and the data provides focus which unexpectedly gives curiosity even more room to thrive.

Instead of limiting the conversation, the EQ-i framework sharpens it, helping my clients move more quickly from awareness to insight, and from insight to meaningful change. It’s simply become a more direct way into the conversations that matter most, and a shift that has shaped how I coach.

If you’re interested in learning more, drop us a line! I’d love to chat about how this certification could help you better support your clients.

Miranda Donald, Leadership Coach and Facilitator at LeedHR

Previous
Previous

It’s time to rebrand emotions at work

Next
Next

Laziness: A Useful Leadership Strategy